Editorial Policy
Our editorial standard is designed to keep product facts, vendor claims and independent evidence visibly separate.
Source hierarchy
- Current product label and packaging supplied from a traceable product source
- Current vendor or checkout information
- Official product support pages
- FDA, NIH/NIA and other authoritative public-health sources
- PubMed-indexed and peer-reviewed research
When sources conflict, the article should describe the conflict rather than silently selecting the more promotional version.
Product facts versus evidence
A price graphic can establish what a price graphic displays; it cannot establish clinical efficacy. An ingredient trial can inform what happened with that ingredient in that study; it cannot automatically prove the finished commercial combination works the same way.
This distinction is applied throughout the Neura research and ingredient pages.
Claims we avoid
We do not fabricate ratings, testimonials, endorsements, scarcity, clinical trials, ingredient doses, FDA approval or disease-treatment claims. We also avoid presenting an affiliate website as the manufacturer.
Updates and corrections
Commercial information is time-sensitive. Pages display a last-updated date and should be revised when material seller terms change. Scientific pages should be revisited when higher-quality evidence becomes available.
If a statement is corrected, the replacement should preserve the evidence distinction rather than simply swapping in another unsupported claim.
Affiliate relationships
See also our Medical Review Policy for how reviewer attribution is handled.
Affiliate compensation does not convert a vendor statement into independent evidence. Sponsored purchase links are disclosed and use rel attributes identifying the commercial relationship.